Check The Tape – Western Michigan September 5, 2012

My plan for this year is to have the Check The Tape post up on Monday. Feels like the perfect Sunday night thing. My son is finally getting to the homework he put off all weekend, my wife goes to bed early because Monday is her busiest day and she goes in a little early, and I’m dying to get my eyes on the tape from Saturday’s game.

Except this week, I’m posting this on Wednesday. Because Sunday and Monday I was enjoying the Labor Day weekend out of town with my family. Sunday night, I didn’t feel like checking any tape – I was teaching my nephew how to melt the chocolate for the perfect smore. (Can “smore” be singular? The perfect smores? English is hard.)

For this CTT, I decided to concentrate on the offense. What worked (the Lankford pass), and what didn’t (the entire second half). Starting with the good.

The first quarter touchdown was the perfect use of the “four verticals” play. Five plays into his playcalling career and Chris Beatty got all Air Raid. Look at the safety (#33) below. That’s the very moment where he knows he’s screwed. All of the defenders are looking for one of the receivers to break out into some underneath pattern, but they don’t. It’s four verticals. Which means the other safety has to choose Lankford or Evan Wilson. He chose Wilson. Lankford scored.

And now for the things we need to work on. Want to know how Mikel Leshoure racked up so many yards? Vision. He developed the ability to see the lanes as they were developing. I say “developed” because as a freshman, he wasn’t the best at it. Took him about 18 games before he was ready to break out. This was game 1 (er, kind of game 4) for Josh Ferguson.

In this play, as Ferguson reaches the line of scrimmage with a choice. Plant his right foot and cut left, or plant his left foot and cut right. As you see in the picture, he chose “plant right cut left”. But notice the lane behind Teddy Karras (#69).

And this is what happened. The outside linebacker came up and made the tackle at the 25. But notice the lane behind Karras. Still wide open because the backside help isn’t there yet. One cut – one snap decision to cut right instead of left – and Ferguson could have picked up 5-8 more yards.

Later in the second quarter, here’s a Donovonn Young run. My focus here isn’t on Young but on Hugh Thornton and Spencer Harris. Both of them were a half-second from completing a block that would have sprung Young. Harris (nearside receiver) comes off the ball looking for a linebacker to block. Thornton’s responsibility is to chip the outside guy and make sure he’s outside the tight end and then look for a linebacker. In this screencap, Thornton is just leaving Evan Wilson with the defensive end and looking for his next block.

But Thornton left that block about a half-second too late and he’s not able to get to the linebacker (he’s just missing his block on the “B” of “B1G” below). And Harris let the other linebacker get outside of his block (right at the 30 yard line). These two bring down Young for a short gain. Had they been blocked, Young would have been one on one with the safety.

OK, to the third quarter. Want to see how defensive penetration can kill a running play? Here, the handoff is going to Donovonn Young, running to the left side behind Thornton, Hill, and Pocic.

But this play is already over. A Western Michigan defensive tackle has driven Graham Pocic back, which pushes Donovonn Young to the outside. Alex Hill (#52) is looking for someone to block.

And now both Hill and Pocic are looking at Donovonn Young on the ground, dropped for a five yard loss, killing the drive. If the line allows this kind of defensive penetration, we’ll struggle to run the ball all season.

See also: if other teams don’t respect our passing game, we’ll struggle to run the ball all season. This is the beginning of the 4th quarter. Second and 5. Western Michigan is flat daring us to pass by putting 8 guys squarely in the box.

And then, on the snap, everyone is coming downhill. The right outside backer holds for a second (verifying that the tight end isn’t going out), but the other three dive in towards the line on the snap of the ball. This leaves two corners and a safety to cover two receivers, but Western Michigan doesn’t care. They’re gambling that we can’t beat them with the pass. And they’re stopping Ferguson for a short gain with their eight guys in the box.

That’s my concern for the entire season right there. Not just loaded boxes – overloaded defenses. Show a weakness in one phase of your offense and your next opponent will overload to force you to try it. We wouldn’t have to necessarily throw it over the top to keep the defense honest above – throw a successful bubble screen and hurt ‘em on the edges. But Western Michigan knew we weren’t going to try anything, so they just instructed their linebackers to run down hill on the snap.

Now, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing in a game where you have the lead and your quarterback is injured. The worst thing we could have done on that drive was turn the ball over and give them a short field. So I was OK with our conservative offense, given how our defense was playing.

But this was Western Michigan. Play like that against a Big Ten opponent, and we’ll be wondering why the offense is going backwards.

Share
9 Comments
GrogsBBQPepperoni September 5th, 2012

.
I really hope this is a case of (and a combination of) a “tight” playbook, an incredibly rusty (can metal “petrify”) Reilly O’Toole, and a poor offensive line day. Just a really bad bad offensive day and a key cog missing. Right?
.
By the way, am I the only guy excited that we have a coach that wears a visor. Those guys always excel, don’t they (even if they have to cheat – I’m looking in your direction, Mr. Sean Payton). I think that fact alone gets us one win we would not otherwise have.
.
Great analysis Robert.

illiniranger September 5th, 2012

the offense was bad, but i don’t think they looked like a total train wreck like last year. even in the 2nd half jon davis was getting some nice burst up the middle. granted, we didn’t look good but until nate went out we didn’t look like the dumpster fire we were the last 6 games last year.
.
i also think the playbook was essentially closed. we got creative on the 4th play of the game and never really went back to that. which sounds like bad news except… WE MEANT TO DO THAT!!! I can’t tell everyone how happy i am about how that first game was coached. not overexposing the playbook? check. not throwing the ball 40 times when we clearly aren’t a great passing team? check. looking for something and exploiting it early in the game? check. calling timeout before halftime? check. no special teams goofiness? check.
.
i only have two minor gripes about the game. one, i would have liked to have seen some more OLinemen play to get some reps. two, we have yet another silly pre-extra point formation. oh well, i’ll happily trade some silly extra point formation for good coaching adjustments.
.
i think our coaching staff is competent. thus, i think the offense improves this week.

PittsburghNellie September 5th, 2012

I’m not putting much weight into the “we meant to do that”/”we were being conservative” argument.
.
Not that i’m saying they weren’t being conservative, it’s just that you can effectively score points while being conservative if you have a decent offense. Our offense was less than decent after that first possession.

kgwasmyfavorite13 September 5th, 2012

Robert, Good God, I love this site! You think like I think, you write what I want to read and I hope someday to enjoy a beer and a dog with you at an Illini Rose Bowl!

chief23 September 5th, 2012

Good assessment. I’m really hoping the coaches are making adjustments, the offense of the last 6 games last year is just not acceptable. The talent on offense isn’t there to be great in my opinion but to keep running on 1st and 2nd down with 8 guys in the box just doesn’t make sense against a non-MAC defense. Under Zook I rarely felt the team actually got better throughout the year ( maybe 2007?). The fan base is not interested in this team yet, at least not enough to show up for games, it won’t be the end of the world if we lose the ASU game however it will be weeks until Beckman could win back some fans again (PSU game). Maybe not fair but that’s the way it is. This year is extremely important for the momentum of the program, every year is important but with so much turnover on the defense in 2013 it’s really vital to have some success this year, 6-6 this year and I’m guessing maybe 40,000 show up at Soldier Field in 2013.

thegoah September 5th, 2012

I just keep thinking about the last 6 games last year. Would this day of offense have seemed so terrible amid that stream? Bad, yes. Last season-bad? Not exactly. I mean…for goodness sake…we scored a TD and it wasn’t even the 3th qtr down by 25!

Dogsofwar September 6th, 2012

This is a great setup Robert, i hope you have the time to do this all year. Its like looking at game film with the players and coaches and knowing what we have to correct/practice on for the next outing.

16th&mission September 6th, 2012

agree on the visor. beckman strikes me as kind of dorky-looking, but he looked badass on the sideline saturday.

I-L-L September 6th, 2012

I personally have no concerns about the offense for two reasons. First we were suppose to be hit by a hurricane so opening the playboom wasn’t looking like an option. Second, didn’t Robert say right here on this site that he was worried about growing pains switching to a spread like Michigan did when they switched? So with that said it wasnt a horrendous debacle like Michgan had against Utah back when they switched. I would expect much the same in the desert this week with or without a banged up NS behind center, once B1G play starts i would anticipate seeing the Black Cat and the playbook to really expand.